Rob wrote:

> As a systems programmer I
> would need to have some feeling about what type of support SuSE or
> RedHat would be delivering so I can convince my management.

This is exately the point (or the disadvatage of SuSE's offer).
By using Open Source Software I also want to get (and pay) Support and
Maintenance wherever I like and not implicitly by the creator of the
Distribution.
Heinz


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New SuSE Enterprise Server


"Post, Mark K" wrote:

> Well, even though this is acceptable under the GPL, I have to say that I'm
> disappointed SuSE is doing this.  I understand it is for business reasons,

I think it would be very tough to make a profitable business doing
only a Linux for S/390 distribution. Things that work for Intel due
to the huge number of installs will not work for S/390 because of
a relatively small number of installations. I really believed the
current distributers had understood that getting their distribution
on the S/390 at a site will create more Intel sales as well. I know
that I personally purchased initially a RedHat for Intel because
the Marist setup was based on RedHat, and after that I bought two
SuSE distributions only because my S/390 distribution was SuSE.

In many cases Linux for S/390 gets in through the back entrance by
some people who are eager to try things and demonstrate. The need
to send a mail to some sales person is an additional obstacle to
get things in, just because such a mail would be too official and
may need approval by someone high up in the food chain.

I predict that if RedHat is going to offer their distribution for
download, that most people outside Germany will prefer that over
a beta from SuSE, no matter how small the difference between the
beta and the GA version is (because you cannot tell). And when a
real installation is considered then the case is clear.

When a solution based on Linux for S/390 is going into production
there probably is little resistance to pay for some support that
you can recognize as necessary for the installation. Typically a
mainframe shops more frequently pays for software they do not use
than use software without a license. As a systems programmer I
would need to have some feeling about what type of support SuSE or
RedHat would be delivering so I can convince my management.

Rob

Reply via email to