Holger, This implies that some of the test cases failed. If so, could you tell us which ones are not yet working?
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Holger Smolinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: XFS, ReiserFS, JFS, EXT2... Frank, we have sucecssfully passed lots of our test cases using ext3. Best Regards Holger Smolinski -- Dr. Holger Smolinski, Tech. Planning (Storage I/O) for Linux on zSeries IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH,Sch�naicher Str. 220, 71032 B�blingen FAX: +49-7031-16-3456, Tel. +49-7031-16-4652 Frank Warzecha <fwarzecha@rzne To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t.de> cc: Sent by: Linux Subject: XFS, ReiserFS, JFS, EXT2... on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARIST.EDU> 08.01.02 15:34 Please respond to Linux on 390 Port Hi, I was testing different filesystems, and ran into problems with most of them: on 2.4.7: - ReiserFS worked fine and fast, but an NFS-client (NFS3 or NFS2) gave me stale NFS handles. - JFS worked correctly, also with NFS, but is terribly slow. - Ext2 was fast and worked with NFS, but it is not jounaling! I applied SGI's XFS-patch from http://oss.sgi.com to the 2.4.16 Kernel tree, and tested the following: - four dasds were formatted with blocksize of 256 - XFS works fine and very fast on a single dasd - I ran into problems with XFS on a logical volume on all four devices (kernel-hang) Did anyone have any experiences with XFS (or Ext3) on S/390-Linux? Any patches that work? Mit freundlichen Gr��en, Frank Warzecha ------------------------------------- Frank Warzecha, Team Betriebssysteme RZNet AG, Kerpen, Germany >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Neue Telefon Nummer: >>>>>>>>Tel:02273-603172 http://www.rznet.de
