> I think that may not be enough. The 2.4.7 system may be > a little larger than the 2.2.16 systems, just enough to make > a difference. > > Indeed, I once tried a "java -version" on a 128MB z/OS image > and crashed it.
Really?! I used to run Java 1.1.7 in an 8 Mbyte (+8 Mbyte swap) 486. If it really won't run in 128, someone ought file a bug report. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition.
