Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers
**Looks startled, and stares at his company mascots.** Actually we do.
For every new machine who roosts at a company that is our customer, we
budget typically 4500 dollars to support it. Most of it is worked out,
in trade.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."� Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Norman Bollinger
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Mainframes are More Expensive Than Racked Servers
> 
> Yeah and ten years ago the IBM study said that for every personal
> computer bought you will spend $3,000 to support it. Who counts that
money.
> Most people don't.
> 
> Norman
> 
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Ann Smith wrote:
> 
> > Some of this article defintely does not make sense.
> > The issue of personnel for example. Sys admin's no longer need to be
bothered
> with a lot of software maintenance on the server. With LINUX/390
> > software can be maintained for hundreds of servers by  the small VM
staff. Also,
> the peaks and valleys of Web demand  is a reason companies who
> > depend on e-commerce are using the mainframe.  Handling the peaks
and valleys
> is a mainframe strength.
> >
> > "Tormey, Paul P" wrote:
> >
> > > We are in the eternal struggle - trying to get Management to try
LINUX on
> > > the zSeries.
> > > However, we are continually faced with the costs of Mainframe
against Unix
> > > and Windows Servers.
> > >
> > > Does the note below make sense or is there a counter argument.
> > >
> > > Look forward to help form the team.
> > >
> > > Paul Tormey
> > > LAN Services
> > > Standard Bank of South Africa.
> > >
> > > 011 636 4103
> > > 083 252 5292
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 05 February, 2002 08:47
> > > To: Lea Van Der Want
> > > Subject: Mainframes are More Expensive Than Racked Servers
> > >
> > > IT INSIGHTS FROM META GROUP --- February 05, 2002
> > > Published in association with ITworld.com
> > > http://www.itworld.com/newsletters
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > ____
> > >
> > > RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS
> > >
> > > * Mainframes Are More Expensive Than Racked Servers for
Presentation
> > >   and Application Levels
> > > * Building the "Right" IT Organization
> > > * Managing the Middleware Portfolio
> > >
> > > IT RESOURCES
> > >
> > > * Operations Excellence Infusion Program
> > > * IT Portfolio Management Briefings
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > ____
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINK
> > >
> > > WEBCAST: 4 WINNING E-COMMERCE STRATEGIES FOR A
> TURBULENT ECONOMY
> > >
> > > Learn how you can use e-commerce as a competitive advantage for
your
> > > company by not following in their shaky footsteps, but by learning
from
> > > their mistakes and improving upon them. Tune in now!
> > >
> > > http://www.itworld.com/jwc/ITWNL09B/GE_ecommerce
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > __
> > >
> > > Visit http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a7 for
daily IT
> news
> > > analysis, analyst
> > > insights, and research reports.
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > >
> > > FEATURED ARTICLE
> > > MAINFRAMES ARE MORE EXPENSIVE THAN RACKED SERVERS FOR
> PRESENTATION AND
> > > APPLICATION LEVELS
> > >
> > > IBM and Computer Associates have been arguing that partitioned
> > > mainframes running Linux are competitive with rack-mounted servers
as
> > > platforms for Apache Web servers and other presentation-level and
> > > application-level uses. Some users, particularly in the financial
> > > industry, are listening, and argue that more mature operations
> > > processes and advanced staffing skills as well as the extra
management
> > > features of the mainframe make it the logical server for all
aspects of
> > > important Web sites.
> > >
> > > Although staff and process maturity are a valid issue for some
> > > mainframe-focused organizations, we believe Linux-based mainframe
> > > partitions will not be competitive with "scale out" strategies
based on
> > > rack-mounted, low-end Intel server farms for "edge functions" long
> > > term. Therefore, we believe the mainframe is the wrong platform
for
> > > edge functions such as Web presentation. Not only is the mainframe
> > > hardware much more expensive per MIPS -- even with IBM selling
Linux
> > > partitions at half price -- but VM software adds additional
expense and
> > > support considerations. Personnel costs, which are the largest
portion
> > > of the cost of a data center, are fairly equal. However, new
software
> > > and skill development in the Web presentation arena is clearly
focused
> > > on scale-out approaches based on many blades of commodity servers
and
> > > network load balancers.
> > >
> > > The mainframe's strengths are vital in large-scale DBMS server
> > > environments, but are of far less value for relatively stateless
edge
> > > services. This is particularly true in the Web publish pattern,
where
> > > information is being published outbound from a Web site. In a Web
> > > server farm, load balancing and redundancy is typically provided
via
> > > the network. If a server develops problems, network load balancers
> > > simply fail-route traffic to another server in the rack that is
running
> > > the same load, and the bad unit can be pulled out and replaced
with, at
> > > most, minor interruption to processing.
> > >
> > > The peaks and valleys of Web demand also make load management
difficult
> > > on a mainframe, where the goal is often to keep the entire system
> > > operating at high capacities, such as 80% or higher. While robust
> > > mainframe workload management enables management of fluctuating
demand,
> > > reallocating peak MIPS capacity is more expensive than with
commodity
> > > Wintel or Lintel server farms. On a server farm, on the other
hand,
> > > hardware costs are so low that the only important concern is that
> > > adequate service be maintained to customers during peak times. The
low
> > > hardware -- and particularly software -- cost makes idle time on
the
> > > processors during low demand periods a minor concern.
> > >
> > > One potential advantage of running the application and
presentation
> > > layers on the mainframe, with the database layer, is faster
response
> > > times. Each step in each transaction is milliseconds faster.
However,
> > > in most cases, this speed differential is unlikely to make enough
> > > difference to justify the order-of-magnitude extra cost of the
> > > mainframe solution.
> > >
> > > The largest potential benefit from running edge services on the
> > > mainframe is leveraging the most mature set of operations skill
sets
> > > and processes, as well as any excess cycles that may be available.
> > > However, long term, we believe the momentum and focus of deploying
edge
> > > services on commodity scale-out solutions outweigh these benefits.
> > >
> > > USER ACTION:  Although the mainframe can generally be a more
dependable
> > > platform, we do not believe the long-term challenges of
maintaining
> > > management skills to run Web presentation services on the
mainframe or
> > > the cost premium (vs. commodity servers) are justified for
presentation-
> > > layer infrastructure. Furthermore, the lack of ISV enthusiasm and
the
> > > decline in mainframe skills during the next five to seven years
makes
> > > this a doubtful option long term for most shops.
> > >
> > > We recommend that organizations match the type of work being done
and
> > > the service-level goals, such as availability and scalability, to
the
> > > appropriate computing platform. A key consideration should also be
> > > existing operations process maturity and staff skill levels.
However,
> > > workloads that easily scale out across multiple commodity servers
> > > should not be centralized onto more expensive platforms simply
because
> > > of skill and process issues. In this case, the right answer is to
> > > improve the skills and processes associated with running scale-out
> > > environments.
> > >
> > > META Group analysts Rakesh Kumar, Val Sribar, Brian Richardson,
Rob
> > > Schafer, Rich Evans, William Zachmann, and Philip Dawson
contributed to
> > > this article.
> > >
> > > Read trend forecasts, cost-cutting ideas, and other information
from
> > > META Group's Enterprise Data Center Strategies advisory service.
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a1
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > >
> > > BALANCE YOUR IT BUDGET!
> > > LISTEN TO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT RESEARCH BRIEFINGS
> > >
> > > >From this series of free Portfolio Managment Research Briefings,
> > > presented by senior META Group analysts, you will learn how to
ensure
> > > that IT cost-cutting -- and continued strategic spending -- are
done
> > > with business precision. Choose from seven titles:
> > >
> > > Briefing 1. The Business of IT Portfolio Management
> > > Briefing 2. Architecture, Program Management, and Human Capital:
> > > Balancing People and Processes
> > > Briefing 3. Infrastructure and Operations: Delivering on the
Promise
> > > Briefing 4. ROIghtsizing the Application Portfolio: From Commerce
to
> > > Customers
> > > Briefing 5. Business Portfolios and the Sustainable Innovation
Community
> > > Briefing 6. The Future of Portfolio Sourcing
> > > Briefing 7. Security, Trust, and Privacy: Balancing Internal and
> > > External Demand
> > >
> > > Click here to access these Portfolio Management Research
Briefings.
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a6
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > >
> > > BUILDING THE "RIGHT" IT ORGANIZATION
> > >
> > > When modifying the IT organization, enterprises must consider
existing
> > > performance and work activities -- including how they relate to
one
> > > another -- as well as issues that the future organization intends
to
> > > improve/solve. Cross-process integration and governance models
should
> > > establish the baseline from which future directions may be mapped.
> > > Learn more by listening to "Building the 'Right' IT Organization,"
a
> > > series of three audio briefings presented by META Group analysts
David
> > > Cearley and Dan Vogel.
> > >
> > > PART ONE: THE BASICS
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a3
> > >
> > > PART TWO: EVOLVING PLAN/BUILD/RUN MODELS
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a4
> > >
> > > PART THREE: GEOGRAPHIC IT ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a5
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > >
> > > FEATURED RESEARCH
> > > MANAGING THE MIDDLEWARE PORTFOLIO
> > >
> > > Middleware supporting critical component models, application
> > > integration, data management, and other core application functions
> > > constitutes an increasing part of software expenditures. By 2003,
most
> > > IT organizations will have amassed a diverse collection of
platform
> > > components, including application servers, integration servers,
data
> > > integration mechanisms, legacy connectivity adapters, content
managers,
> > > commerce servers, and security apparatus. The convergence of
e-business
> > > platform components, growing overlap of middleware products, and
> > > extensive availability of new e-business systems will create
increasing
> > > redundancy in most organizations' middleware portfolio. During
2003/04,
> > > most Global 2000 IT organizations will struggle to reduce their
> > > middleware portfolio to manageable size and to implement controls
on
> > > middleware investments.
> > >
> > > Read the full-text of this article (free member login required).
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a2
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > >
> > > INFUSION PROGRAM: OPERATIONS EXCELLENCE
> > >
> > > Highly effective IT operations are critical to the rapid
deployment and
> > > successful management of all enterprise computing resources
(hardware,
> > > software, network, and personnel) needed to run business
application
> > > workloads. META Group's Operations Excellence Infusion program
imparts
> > > a strategic and practical knowledgebase that companies can
leverage to
> > > transform their operations groups into powerful partners with
business
> > > units. The program provides best practices, workshops and working
> > > sessions, and ongoing analyst support focused on the following
areas:
> > >
> > >     * Data center and distributed operations
> > >     * Technical support/engineering
> > >     * Distributed and desktop computing
> > >     * Help desk and customer service
> > >     * Sourcing of operational components
> > >     * Service-level agreement management
> > >     * Asset management (hardware, software negotiations, tracking,
> > >       inventory)
> > >     * Rapid assimilation of new technologies
> > >     * Operational processes (change management, capacity
management,
> > >       asset management, etc.)
> > >
> > > For more information, please call 800-945-META (US) or
203-973-6700
> > > (outside US), or click on the following link.
> > >
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a0
> > >
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > ____
> > >
> > > CUSTOMER SERVICE
> > >
> > > SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE:
> > > - Go to: http://www.itworld.com/newsletters
> > > - Click on "View my newsletters" to log in and manage your account
> > > - To subscribe, check the box next to the newsletter
> > > - To unsubscribe, uncheck the box next to the newsletter
> > > - When finished, click submit
> > >
> > > Questions? Please e-mail customer service at:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > ____
> > >
> > > CONTACTS
> > >
> > > * Editorial: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Advertising: Clare O'Brien, Vice President of Sales,
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Career Corner: Janis Crowley, Vice President/General Manager,
IDG
> > >   Recruitment Solutions, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Other inquiries: Jodie Naze, Senior Product Marketing Manager,
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> ________
> > > ____
> > >
> > > PRIVACY POLICY
> > >
> > > ITworld.com has been TRUSTe certified
> > > http://www.itworld.com/Privacy/
> > >
> > > Copyright 2002 META Group, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoNow/a14724a51924a75999756a7
> > >
> > > **SEND TO A FRIEND**
> > > Share this email with a friend! Click here!
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/GoForward/a14724a51924aSa75999756a6
> > >
> > > SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE
> > > Please click on the link below to modify your subscription,
unsubscribe,
> > > or change your email address:
> > >
> > > http://itw.itworld.com/Change-Remove/a14724a75999756a6a51924
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Disclaimer and confidentiality note
> > >
> > > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the
official business of
> Standard Bank Investment Corporation (Stanbic)
> > > is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally
privileged and protected
> by law.\
> > > Stanbic does not own and endorse any other content. Views and
opinions are
> those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Stanbic.
> > >
> > > The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised
recipient.
> > > Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally
reached you and
> do not read, disclose or use the content in any way.
> > >
> > > Stanbic can not assure that the integrity of this communication
has been
> maintained
> > > nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> >

Reply via email to