On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Post, Mark K wrote: > Rob, > > I looked back at what we published in the Distributions RedBook. > What I saw there was a pvcreate for /dev/dasde1 /dev/dasdf1 /dev/dasdg1, > not just /dev/dasde, /dev/dasdf, /dev/dasdg. ...
WHY???
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Post, Mark K wrote: > Rob, > > I looked back at what we published in the Distributions RedBook. > What I saw there was a pvcreate for /dev/dasde1 /dev/dasdf1 /dev/dasdg1, > not just /dev/dasde, /dev/dasdf, /dev/dasdg. ...
WHY???