Alright, found out he had started the df/dss logical dump long before I
thought.  Before I could umount the device.  Sorry for all my posting.  I'll
be quiet for awhile, promise :).

~ Daniel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> What we had tried before was a physical dump, which took seconds.  Tried
> to figure out why, saw that MVS saw the dataset as empty and concluded
> that was why..  I went back to our backup guy and tried the logical
> instead of physical dump.  Discovered a previous omission, we hadn't
> catalogued the dataset to MVS and once we did the logical dump/restore
> seemed fine for the most part.  Did a logical dump, removed the "empty"
> dataset in MVS, restore.  Remounting the file system in linux resulted
> in a "kernel: EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is
> recommended" which I unfortunately didn't see immediately (after I had
> made changes to the file system).  When I did I umounted and ran an e2fsck:
> Block bitmap differences:  -80540 (through) -80847
> Free blocks count wrong for group #2 (29294, counted=24634).
> Free blocks count wrong (269403, counted=264743).
> Free inodes count wrong (270654, counted=270655).
> all fixed
>
> I'm fairly sure i was umounted before the dump started.  A tar -df
> /path/to/tar_archive didn't yield any differences before the e2fsck.  I
> did do a fdasd to see the
>              -----------tracks----------
>                Device      start      end   length   Id  System
>           /dev/dasdh1          2    50084    50083    1  Linux native
>
> change to
>
>              -----------tracks----------
>                Device      start      end   length   Id  System
>                                2    50084    50083       unused
>
> when the dataset was deleted in mvs.  But that wouldn't have caused any
> problems.
>
> Also, it seems to me that the lack of catalogueing shouldn't have made a
> difference for the physical dump.  Unfortunately, backup guy's gone now.
> I am so desperate to test some more and figure out what's going on
> here, but can't.
>
> Arrgh,
> ~ Daniel
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >DF/DSS should work.  You'll probably have to specify ALLEXCP and ALLDATA,
> or
> >do a physical dump instead of a logical dump of the volume.
> >
> >Mark Post
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:51 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Backup possibilities under the 2.2.x kernal
> >
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >>above for file-level backups. Amanda is probably the best bet here as
> >>well, along with using DFDSS to do full volume dumps periodically with
> >>the Linux system down for consistency sake.
> >>
> >So DFDSS works fine?  When our dasd guy tried it on a linux volume, the
> >program would return with a condition code 0... but after seconds (not
> >20 minutes or so).  In MVS the dataset would show up, for example,
> >LINUX.VOX6BC2.PART0001.NEW with all of its tracks allocated, but viewing
> >the file would result in a message saying that the file was empty, which
> >is why he thought DFDSS finished so quickly.  So I resorted to OFFLINDR
> >which works great, but if DFDSS will also work then he'd prefer to use
> that.
> >
> >Am I the only one who DFDSS didn't work for?  I'm using a 2.4 kernel,
> >btw, in an LPAR.
> >
> >~ Daniel
>

Reply via email to