Oh, we do, but in most cases our corrections wind up somewhere in the ozone. Only one writer that I know of has ever written about any of the input they've received, and that was just recently.
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The mainframe is back ... perhaps one of us, or the group in general should pen a polite editorial correction and submit them when these stories go off the trolley. |---------+----------------------------> | | "Post, Mark K" | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | m> | | | Sent by: Linux on| | | 390 Port | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | IST.EDU> | | | | | | | | | 05/02/2002 04:33 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | Linux on 390 Port| | | | |---------+----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: The mainframe is back ... | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------| I just wish the writer had gotten more of her facts right. Sigh. Even the ones who try to write positive articles come across as ignorant hacks. Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: paultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The mainframe is back ... ... according to ESJ. Of course we already knew this. Enjoy http://www.esj.com/departments/article.asp?EditorialsID=59
