James,

Others have responded already, but I do have a couple of things to add and
reiterate.

There is an existing HOWTO on dual booting out there.  Check
http://www.tldp.org/ for it.

Keep in mind that NTFS support in Linux is reliable for _reading only_.  Do
_not_ activate write support if you value your data/Operating System.  The
only thing you need to write to the NTFS file system is the first 512 bytes
from your Linux boot partition.  Use a floppy to transfer it to your NTFS
file system.

In the past, the file name that went into c:\boot.ini absolutely _had_ to be
an 8.3 filename.  I don't know if that is still true for Win2K or not.  An
experiment and report back here would be appreciated.

Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: current Linux distribution


Any advice to making a machine dual boot with windows 2000 onboard already?



|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Post, Mark K"   |
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           m>               |
|         |           Sent by: Linux on|
|         |           390 Port         |
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           IST.EDU>         |
|         |                            |
|         |                            |
|         |           09/03/2002 05:30 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           Linux on 390 Port|
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------|
  |
|
  |       To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:  Re: current Linux distribution
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------|




Shimon,

If you've got a Windows machine at home, I would recommend installing an
Intel Linux distribution on it in "dual boot" mode. (SuSE, since that seems
to be the S/390 version you want to use.)  Then, when you download your
files, the symlinks will just be symlinks and not take up large amounts of
disk space.

If you don't want that kind of an adventure, I would say that you could
leave out the entire KDE package, which would include the k2de1, k2de2 and
k2de3 directories.  You could probably not include xdev1 and xdev2.
Likewise e1 and e2, unless you're an Emacs fan(atic).

Or, if you ask nicely, maybe someone with a broadband connected Linux
system
with a CD burner will download and burn them for you.  :)  A snail mail
address would be of help in that regard.

Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Shimon Lebowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 1:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: current Linux distribution


> With the exception of Debian, and Turbolinux, none of the Linux/390
> distributions are available via .iso images.  SuSE, and Red Hat only
offer
> individual RPMs and SRPMs.  As recommended by Philipp, wget will be your
> friend.  Once you have them downloaded you can verify the integrity of
the
> RPMs by using rpm to check the md5sums.  Or, as Alan Cox pointed out, you
> can download the public key of the distribution maker, and use rpm to
verify
> the packages that way.

Mark, this looks like it assumes my downloading is done
on a linux machine, which (unfortunately?) is not the case.
I have been using WS-FTP on W98 (at home!) to download all
of the /cd1 directory from the SuSE sles beta site, and I am
almost finished it (still using non broadband modems).

Something that is disturbing is that there seem to be
large areas of the tree which are apparently just links
to files in other areas, but I am getting them duplicated
in my download. I already have far more than 650MB,
and am getting worried that a 700MB CD will also not
be enough.

Are there any tips available regarding how to build a SuSE
CDROM on a Windows system? Are there recommended
areas in the tree to 'prune' in order to save space? This is
another reason why I am sorry there is no ISO format,
although I do understand what seem to be SuSE's marketing
concerns.

Thank you all for your help, it is always encouraging
knowing there are experts willing to help out!

Shimon--
************************************************************************
Shimon Lebowitz                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM System Programmer           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Israel Police National HQ.
http://www.poboxes.com/shimonl/pubkey.htm
Jerusalem, Israel              phone: +972 2 530-9877  fax: 530-9308
************************************************************************

Reply via email to