On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:51:59AM -0400, Dave Myers wrote:
> 1. What are the benefits of using Linux for these "gateways" instead of just
>     using z/VM TCPIP itself?

Possibly a little less raw speed (haven't seen a thorough analysis yet);
however you gain easy access to the network filtering stuff, so you can
do firewalling and access control really easily.  I find it a lot easier
to reconfigure Linux TCP/IP on the fly, but then I'm much more
comfortable in Linux than in VM.

Be warned--at least one recent revision of the QDIO drivers used the
FASTPATH (or some such) option, which meant it was incompatible with
filtering.  I don't know whether IBM has fixed this yet.

> 2.  How much memory resource will these Linux "gateways" require and
>      should we use "stripped-down kernel" Linux images or just inactivate
> unnecessary
>      services on these images (and use the SuSE 'network' install for
> example).

I usually use 32M machines for routing, and I don't bother stripping the
kernel, just turning off all services but ssh.  Small machines, but I
generally give them something like 1% absolute share, because if *they*
don't get dispatched, ain't *nobody* going *nowhere*.

> 3.  What linux routing software should we use on these "gateways"
>      for dynamic routing??

Zebra.  Then use its RIP, RIP-2, or OSPF modules depending on what
you're running on your network.

Adam

Reply via email to