Gerard, This is the second instance of someone reporting "odd" behavior for the 2.4.19 DASD driver. It's beginning to look like a trend. :(
Mark Post -----Original Message----- From: Monteleone [mailto:gmonteleone@;sitec.fr] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dasd name ? Hello, I've just build a new system with kernel 2.4.19 and with all latest recommendations in IBM download area. When I do a: Cat /proc/dasd/devices I get: linuxp:~ # cat /proc/dasd/devices a101(ECKD) at ( 94: 0) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a106(ECKD) at ( 94: 4) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a107(ECKD) at ( 94: 8) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a108(ECKD) at ( 94: 12) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a109(ECKD) at ( 94: 16) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a10a(ECKD) at ( 94: 20) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a100(ECKD) at ( 94: 24) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a10b(ECKD) at ( 94: 28) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a102(ECKD) at ( 94: 32) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB a112(ECKD) at ( 94: 36) is : active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks, 2347 MB Does anybody know why "node name" has disappeared ? TIA for your response. Gerard MONTELEONE Ingenieur Systeme & Reseau * 04.95.23.68.09 / 06.87.72.70.32 S.I.T.E.C zi du Vazzio 20090 AJACCIO Cedex
