You would need at least one non-root/swap address mounted as /config or
something for storing the configuration of what goes where, and you'd
have to move at least a few of the utilities (eg mount, ifconfig, etc)
from /usr to /sbin (generating statically linked versions) and include
/sbin in the root filesystem.

Much as I dislike Solaris, their diskless workstation filesystem layout
is a pretty good model for this. We should use that as a model for
ideas.

-- db

David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
> Kris Van Hees
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: More NSS Info
>
>
> Would it not be sufficient to create the NSS with just the
> boot disk and maybe
> swap configured in on the kernel parameter line, and then
> using something very
> early on in the boot process to add the other disks using
> /proc/dasd/devices?
> It might take some work to get the NSS and RO boot disk just
> right for this to
> work, but it would make it a lot more flexible.
>
>         Kris
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:43:15AM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
> > I don't have the faintest idea why IBM claims that you have
> to have an
> > identical DASD layout on all machines that share an NSS.
> >
> > Admittedly cursory testing seems to show that your NSS will have
> > whatever parameter line you burned into it, which does
> specify a range
> > of devices.  But not only can those devices change size (I
> tested this
> > with an ext3 and a swap filesystem), if you boot without a listed
> > device, the only problem you will have that I could find
> was that you
> > may trip over it in /etc/fstab.
> >
> > But if you have a disk that's not in /etc/fstab, which you
> detach before
> > IPL, you can re-link and then access that disk pefectly
> normally from
> > Linux (using the console or hcp to perform the link).
> >
> > So it's looking to *me* like you should pick a
> lowest-common-denominator
> > disk layout (for most of our guests, that'd be / on 150,
> swap on VDISK
> > on 151, and /usr on 152), build the NSS with as small a
> storage size as
> > you can (24M works for us) and then not worry about it.
> >
> > If anyone can tell me why I'm wrong, and that, although I
> have mounted
> > differently-sized disks, I'm heading for fatal filesystem corruption
> > just around the corner, I'd appreciate it.
> >
> > Adam
>
> --
> Never underestimate a Mage with:
>  - the Intelligence to cast Magic Missile,
>  - the Constitution to survive the first hit, and
>  - the Dexterity to run fast enough to avoid being hit a second time.
>

Reply via email to