Mark,
> I think your guess is correct.  I'm curious as to why you want to make your
> root file system an LVM volume, though.  Do you really think you'll need to
> expand it that much, instead of just adding additional file systems on
> various mount points?
>
to be honest, I just wanted to try out the LVM. And since our AIX guys has also
a volume group for the root filesystem I thought that would be the normal way to
define all available space in volume groups and logical volumes. I'm just
starting with LINUX and try out things to get familiar with it.
Can I have a mixture of non-LVM space and LVM-space? Is it not usual to have the
root fs in an VG/LV?

How can I find out what device 58/0 is (/boot/ipleckd.boot is not on device
(94/0) but on (58/0)) ?

> In any case, one way to test your assumption is to get rid of the
> root-on-LVM setup and try it with just a "normal" ext2 file system on
> /dev/dasda.  I strongly suspect that will work for you.

VGROOT spans over 2 disks, but it includes several LVs:
/dev/vgroot/lvroot   vgroot                          2048         1
/dev/vgroot/lvusr    vgroot                          2048         1
/dev/vgroot/lvvar    vgroot                           256         1
/dev/vgroot/lvhome   vgroot                           128         1

1 disk has a capacity of approx. 2,5 GB, so anything (including /boot, excluding
/usr, /var, /home) should be on the first disk, shouldn't it?

--

Werner Kuehnel
IMD GmbH (Mannheimer Versicherung)
Mannheim - Germany

Reply via email to