I have to second Alan's comments.  Read the archives and you'll see the
frustrations and challenges that I had with SAF.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
Kaiser Permanente Information Technology
25 N. Via Monte Ave
Walnut Creek, Ca 94598

Phone:   (925) 926-5332 (tie line 8/473-5332)
E-Mail:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sametime: (use Lotus Notes address)
AIM:        lbdyck



Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/04/2003 08:27 AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc

Subject
Re: System administration facility/dirmaint






On Monday, 02/03/2003 at 11:37 CST, Alex Leyva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all, somebody knows whats the diferences between the System
> Administration Facility and DirMaint?
> The situation is that the people from IBM told us that they will install
> it after install zvm, i have never heard about it, i read the info about
> it and i think that it is a replacement for DirMaint, so i want to know
> the diferences between both, and the experience of use.

The Systems Administration Facility (SAF) is the z/VM "compatibility mode"
for customers who were using the Virtual Image Facility (VIF) product.  It
is *not* a replacement for DirMaint.

If you were not previously using VIF, then I do NOT recommend that you use
SAF.  While it makes the system easier to administer, it has a lot of
limitations that will frustrate you.

Use DirMaint.

Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM Development

Reply via email to