On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 18:01, Gregg C Levine wrote: > Would anyone familiar with the kernel creation process be able > confirm, or even deny that it has been repaired by the later 2.4.x > kernels? In this case it would be the 2.4.19, or 2.4.20 kernel. > > I phrased my subject that way, so that people would have some idea > regarding the distribution I use.
USMDOS has always been problematic, its pretty much defunct in 2.4 and is unlikely to be in 2.6. Its much cleaner and faster to run a real linux fs loop mounted over FAT32
