OK, Here it is again;
>Greetings;
>
>I get this error if the system has been "idle" for awhile.
>In this case it was about 10hr 02min. I had 4 logons through
>ssh but they were not doing anything.
>
>I am running the 2.4.19 kernel w/timer patch.
>That is kernel-image-2.4.19-s390 from debian.org
>with no other patches applied.
>
>I don't remember having a similar problem on the original woody kerne.
>
>TIA for any help.
>Dennis
>
>
>00:00:48 00: CON FILE 0038 SENT TO MAINT RDR AS 6012 RECS 0298 CPY
001 T >NOHOLD NOKEEP
>00:00:52 HCPCFX6769I Your SECUSER terminated by SYSMON.
>07:35:02 device ctc0 left promiscuous mode
>07:35:06 device ctc0 entered promiscuous mode
>07:36:41 kernel BUG at swap.c:62!
>illegal operation: 0001
>CPU: 1 Tainted: P
>Process apache (pid: 669, task: 012d0000, ksp: 012d1c60)
>Krnl PSW : 07080000 80041fac
>Krnl GPRS: 012bcb00 012d1b4c 00000019 00000001
> 80041faa 00000000 0155c600 00000001
> 001c0f44 001c0b00 002fe488 00000001
> 002fe4a0 80041ee4 80041faa 012d1c48
>Krnl ACRS: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>Krnl Code: 58 30 d0 14 18 2a 58 10 30 00 a7 2a 00 1c 58 40 d0 18 50 20
>Call Trace: -<00039298>- -<000448dc>- -<00044cbe>- -<00035914>-
-<00036116>- >-<00014604>-
Again, TIA!
Dennis
|--------+------------------------------------------>
| | Ulrich Weigand |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | langen.de> |
| | Sent by: Linux on 390 Port |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| | |
| | |
| | 03/18/2003 06:07 PM |
| | Please respond to Linux on 390 |
| | Port |
| | |
|--------+------------------------------------------>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Help! Was: kernel BUG at swap.c:62!
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Dennis Wicks wrote:
>If anyone needs more info let me know and I will do my best to
>dig it out.
How about your kernel version? It's kind of hard to find the
correct line 62 in swap.c without knowing which kernel ;-)
Could you describe the type of workload you are running?
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
