On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:34:26 +0800, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Joseph Temple wrote:
>
>> I would point out that clustering makes hardware more available, not more
>> reliable.
>
>If the application stays up, ir's more reliable.
>
>> The things actually fail more often because there is  more to
>> fail,
>
.....
>We've discussed Google here before: would anyone notice if a few Google
>servers went missing for a while? Seems to me, probably not, and
>according to some in the discussion that is on low-cost hardware.

You always have to take the application into account. A Google session
can drop out with little effect. A money transfer of a million dollars
is quite another story.

john alvord

Reply via email to