You can only migrate to the same CPU architecture. This works well with Intel boxen, but is unlikely to do what you want, since a cluster of z/Series machines would be very expensive.
The cheap (well at least cheaper than many z/Series systems) solution for z/Series is SMP, which is why SMP is supported so well for z/OS. -----Original Message----- From: Jose Manuel Canelas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: offloading CPU intensive loads from zLinux to cheaper pastures Greetings. As a newbie to the mainframe environment (my background is mostly linux), I have grown enthusiastic about this superior hardware I knew very little about. Nevertheless, I have always found it a shame that number crunching workloads are not a good match to the mainframe. Grid computing is interesting as a way to make the best of the cheap computing power provided by intel boxes, on the one hand, and the robustness of the mainframe, on the other, opening new avenues for integrating and using various resources with their own strenghts. If i got it right, it seems that applications need to be grid-aware to be able to use it effectively, which makes it a no-no as a short-term solution. And then I had this idea when I was reading about openMosix. For those of you who haven't heard, check the homepage at http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/. In a nutshell, openMosix is a single-image clustering system implemented as a Linux kernel extension and a set of userland tools. You connect multiple IA-32 boxes with a patched kernel and get a linearly scalable cheap supercomputer. Users treat it like a single machine, as processes are migrated to idle(ier) nodes transparently. So what if we could patch a zLinux image kernel and then made it one of the nodes of one of these clusters? If possible, we would have a way to cleanly offload CPU intensive jobs from the linux/mainframe to cheaper external engines. This would get cheap horsepower to the mainframe, transparently, and would still allow for centralized management (filesystems could still reside on DASD). I can think of at least one disadvantage. If an external node breaks, any processes it is running at the moment will be lost, which wouldn't happen on a zLinux image, as far as I know. Any mainframe and VM gurus care to comment? Is there any reason why this can't be done? Do we loose any more reliability features? Am I missing something that makes it totally impractical? Thanks for your patience :) -- jmc
