On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 03:55, Lucius, Leland wrote: > So I made a small modification to my patch and that was how I got the 4k > blocksize with VDISK. Personally, I don't think the label is all that > important when you get that much more throughput. ;-) But, since it's not > 100% correct, I can see why IBM didn't allow for it.
The label is especially unimportant when it's, well, VDISK-used-for-swap. Not like you will *ever* have a reason to back it up or let another guest see it. Adam
