Jay Maynard wrote: >Does Linux/390 (and/or z/Linux) use disabled wait codes in the same manner >as MVS and VM? Is there any significance to the instruction address part of >the disabled wait PSW? If not, anyone have a guess as to how hard it would >be to add, at least for common cases?
I don't know how MVS and VM use disabled wait codes. On Linux, the (usually) only sitation where a disabled wait PSW is loaded is after a kernel panic happened. In that case, the PSW address is set to the address of the kernel code that performed the panic () call; if you have a kernel disassembly (or at least the System.map), you can at least find out which panic it was if for some reason the console output didn't make it through anymore ... What 'common cases' are you thinking about? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
