On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Lionel Dyck wrote: > I wonder how sco will ask for the license fee: > > http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/21970.html > Seems to me someone's missed the point?
If anyone offers indemnity to Linux users, shouldn't it be those who take the dollars for supplying the software? Red Hat SuSe TurboLinux etc Seems to me if their charge included an identifiable compulsory indemnity charge (passed straight on to the insurance company), folk could quantify the damage SCO causes. If course, those cheapskates who, like me, download a no-charge distro don't get any indemnity. Those vendors _might_ value indemnity from IBM, but that's a separate issue. -- Cheers John. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb Copyright John Summerfield. Reproduction prohibited.
