I doubt that it would be possible to FIND a working System/7! :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fargusson.Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: Re: An update to the little script I post the other day...
I doubt that it would be possible to port Linux. I don't think GCC works on 16-bit systems. -----Original Message----- From: John Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: An update to the little script I post the other day... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fargusson.Alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:56 AM > Subject: Re: An update to the little script I post the other day... > > Now that you mention it, I worked with an IBM assembler on a System3 > that had a similar limit. This was due to the fact that the > mnemonics were in a fixed position on the card, I think in position > 10, which left 8 characters for the definition of symbols. I would > bet that there was something similar on the System360 assembler. > I think the System7 had a similar limit as well, for the same reason. System/7 !?!?!?! I haven't heard mention of that in decades. Is there a Linux port for it? > I would guess that <snip2eof> -- jcf
