On 13.08.2003 at 17:02:23, Simon Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have collected more information about my problem with the VIPA.
<chandev snipped> <zebra.conf snipped> > The /etc/zebra/ospfd.conf is: > > ! -*- ospf -*- > ! > ! OSPFd sample configuration file > ! > ! > hostname c005105 > password pingu > enable password xxxx > ! > interface eth0 > ip ospf cost 10 > ip ospf priority 0 > interface eth1 > ip ospf cost 9 > ip ospf priority 1 > interface hsi0 > ip ospf cost 5 > ip ospf priority 5 > interface dummy0 > ! > router ospf > ospf router-id 141.171.65.34 > network 141.171.65.34/32 area 0.0.0.3 > ! network 141.171.65.32/28 area 0.0.0.3 > network 62.185.124.0/25 area 0.0.0.3 > network 192.168.1.0/24 area 0.0.0.3 > ! > ! > log file /var/log/ospfd.log You've told OSPF that the router is not to be DR (designated router) eligible on the eth0 interface, but that it can be on the eth1 interface (through the "ip ospf priority" commands you've given). This *might* be confusing things, since the two interfaces are configured on the same network. I'd suggest that both interfaces be set to priority 0, since the network folk would probably appreciate your Linux router guests *not* try and take on designated router role. I think you'll also need to add "passive interface" statements for the dummy0 interfaces, so that they get added to the LSAs sent to the network routers. I'm between sessions at SHARE right now, so this is the result of a quick analysis; errors and omissions excepted ;-) Cheers, Vic
