I have to tell you that I tend to ignore what you say when you start arguing religion. You didn't even give a hint as to why you think PL/X is better than C.
-----Original Message----- From: john gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBM's Power5+ to hit 3 GHz Some z/OS comp;onents are still written in the language of IBM's HLASM, but much of it is written in PL/X, which is also a PL/I dialect but which unlike PL/S does a great deal of optimizing before it emits assembly language. Many of you will find this view uncongenial, but PL/X is in fact a much better language for systems- software implementation than C or, particularly, C++. IBM has never released mainframe PL/X for others to use; this policy is, however, under review; its syntax is no longer 'secret' (There will in fact be a SHARE session on it next week); and it may in the fairly near future be licensable. Even so, it is unlikely to be a useful implementation vehicle for generic Linux components because the likelihood of non-IBM implementations of it is negligible. John Gilmore SystemCraft LLC _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
