This may be of interest to people looking at PostgreSQL in an Enterprise setting:
http://lwn.net/Articles/46576/ Basically, the replication server made by the commercial PostgreSQL, Inc, eRServer, is being donated back to the open source PostgreSQL. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Applications & Solutions Team +1.817.255.3225 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its' content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MySql > > > On Gwe, 2003-08-22 at 13:42, Noll, Ralph wrote: > > We are thinking about using MySql for all our production work > > instead of DB2.. > > > > any comments, gotcha, or anything else?? > > It depends how much data you have, what kind of failover you > need and so forth. MySQL (and even more so postgresql) have > all the needed bits for most fairly demanding database use. > > IMHO it depends - what DB2 features do you need, what would you > like, and how much are you willing to pay for them. >
