On Iau, 2003-08-28 at 14:49, Rod Furey wrote: > And if the LSB had chosen apt instead of rpm then... oops, sorry, > religious discussion.
I think you are confused. Apt is a network package management tool, rpm and dpkg are file formats. LSB describes a subset of the rpm package format and not tools. There are several tools for doing apt like stuff with rpm files (notably apt4rpm and yum). The development up2date can do it too > I love apt. Anyone thought of adding in a P2P update method > for it? You can set up apt proxies quite easily.
