Confidentiality Warning:  This e-mail contains information intended only for the use 
of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not the 
intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, 
disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data 
contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail.   If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail.  Thank you.
Not just no mention of Linux/390, no mention of Linux, period. The underlying Veritest 
document just compares various releases of windows to each other, nothing else. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: InfoWorld Article - Microsoft Benchmarks Step Up Linux Assault


I went to the report that the article mentions.  Oddly enough, I found no
mention whatsoever of any Linux/390 results, just Windows.  I'm now
wondering just how this is supposed to show anything about what the article
says it does.  I suppose I could write it off as just another clueless
reporter, but still....


MICROSOFT BENCHMARKS STEP UP LINUX ASSAULT
========================================================================
Posted September 05, 2003 4:37 AM Pacific Time

Stepping up its campaign against the Linux operating system, Microsoft
Corp. on Thursday released file and Web serving benchmark results that,
it claims, show that Linux on the mainframe lags behind Windows 2003 on
Intel Corp. systems in terms of performance for the money.

Microsoft ran the benchmark tests in response to what it believes were
IBM's unsubstantiated claims about the benefits of running Linux on its
mainframe hardware, according to Microsoft General Manager of Platform
Strategy Martin Taylor. "IBM was making some claims and customers were
trying to figure some things out and didn't have the facts in front of
them," he said.

For the full story:
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=43D0DE:1F5EAC5



Mark Post

Reply via email to