On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:38:04AM -0500, Lucius, Leland wrote: > Wow. I can't believe you guys are still caring around every device types > baggage in the DEVBLK for each device. Why should a DASD device allocate > storage that would be used for a TAPE device. Mind, it taint much, but...
Now that we're in a better position to isolate things, I'm sure someone will look at this... I'll forward a copy to the developers' list.
