On Saturday, 11/22/2003 at 08:27 EST, "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked the latest version of this document, lx24jun03dd02.pdf, and > it still gives examples like this: > Or for two network devices (CTC + ESCON): > ctc0,0x601,0x600 > escon3,0x605,0x608 > > Who do I need to contact to get this cleaned up? Something to consider: ctc and escon are synonyms. It is ok to to specify "ctc0" and "escon3", but not ok to have "ctc0" and "escon0". I.e. you can't have the same suffix. But it would probably serve better to simply not document "escon" and to issue messages when duplicate device names are encountered. Alan Altmark Sr. Software Engineer IBM z/VM Development
