Jason,

Try these redbooks (the first may fit your needs the best):

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/9445fa5b416f6e32852569ae006bb65f/976141a6c4ab8de788256cbc000414e8?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,ess

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246424.html?Open

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/9445fa5b416f6e32852569ae006bb65f/724d72fd9fb00d7b88256ae3005a665e?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,ess

http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/9445fa5b416f6e32852569ae006bb65f/75733f58b136da1985256d340074db70?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,ess





                                               To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      Jason Herne              cc:       (bcc: Michael Short/Towers 
Perrin)
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:  Re: DASD Performance problem
                      .edu>
                      Sent by: Linux on
                      390 Port
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      IST.EDU>


                      12/10/2003 12:02
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      Linux on 390 Port






Since I don't maintain the ESS-800, I'm not 100% sure how it's set up or
how to set it up.  Can you point me to some documentation describing how
the ESS-800 works and how I could squeeze as much performance out of it
as possible?  Then maybe I could go to the guys responsible and ask for
their help with it.

I tried to find some shark (i.e. ESS-800) books on my own but with no
luck.  At the ones I found seemed like sales pitches and not "here is
how to set this up!" guides.

- Jason Herne

On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:28, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> You're probably hitting a device/controller contention problem.  Try
> multiple devices on multiple arrays with a striped logical volume.
>
> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 12:14, Jason Herne wrote:
> > I think we may have a performance problem.
> >
> > Our z/800 model 0LF is connected to an ESS800 with two Ficon channel
> > paths.  We have been running dbench in Linux for quite a few weeks now
> > and we are seeing numbers much lower than we expected.  Can someone
> > commnet on this?  Are these numbers about what we should be seeing, or
> > is something wrong with our setup?
> >
> > We're running RHEL with kernel 2.4.21-1.1931.2.399.ent #1 SMP.  Linux
is
> > using a single 3390 DASD with ext3.
> >
> > Here are the numbers we're getting:
> > all tests were run on a single guest with no other Linux guests and
just
> > a few z/VM service guests running.  No disk intestive or CPU intensive
> > workload was running during the testing.
> >
> > dbench clients  avg throughout (MB/s)
> > 1               123.111
> > 3               116.729
> > 6               99.0626
> > 9               95.3577
> > 12              95.2825
> > 15              91.6009
> > 18              92.7745
> > 21              91.8808
> > 24              73.8885
> >
> >
> > Here is what we get with our $1000 Dell Pentiium 2.4Ghz server with a
> > SCSI disk.
> >
> > 1               395.545
> > 3               281.957
> > 6               275.292
> > 9               285.756
> > 12              262.4333
> > 15              248.314
> > 18              237.879
> > 21              221.74355
> > 24              200.873
> >
> >
> > As you can see, the $1k Dell is hammering our $250k mainframe.  We are
> > currently trying to figure out why this is and hopefully fix the
problem
> > if there is indeed a problem...  Any comments or help that anyone could
> > give woule be appreciated.
> >
> > - Jason Herne ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >   Clarkson University Open Source Institute
> >   z/Server Administrator
> --
> Rich Smrcina
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Sytek Services - A Division of DSG
> Milwaukee, WI
> rsmrcina at wi.rr.com
> rsmrcina at dsgroup.com
>
> Catch the WAVV! Stay for requirements and the free-for-all.
> Update your zSeries skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price.
> WAVV 2004 in Chattanooga, TN
> April 30-May 4, 2004
> For details see http://www.wavv.org

Reply via email to