On Gwe, 2004-01-09 at 21:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:46:49PM -0600, Chris Cox wrote: > > It's very likely that Red Hat will make it GPL unless > > there is something inside the thing that would prevent > > that (even then, it just means it'll take a bit longer). > > > > Do you know yet, Alan?
I've no grand product plan to splash to Linux on S/390 beyond what has already been said. Beating up your Red Hat sales contact for information never does any harm though 8) > source, and unless the GFS code is in a much better shape > than at that time (which I strongly doubt) it would be a shame > for redhat to release that code and probably immediately > followed by a few remote exploits for their 'enterprise' > product.. I've talked to Sistina people who said it was, but of course until its open nobody really knows. On the other hand I take comfort from the fact they are going to have to get it past Al Viro 8) > point of failure in Sistina's GFS which is completly untolerable > for HA enviroments is gone) and a first cut of support for the > Linux 2.6 kernel. But even OpenGFS still needs lots of work. I have a stick a finger in the air and guess kind of feeling that there is much from OpenGFS that is better than GFS, and vice versa.
