There's this: http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/perf_hints_tips.sh tml#subcategory3_2.2 <http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/perf_hints_tips.s html#subcategory3_2.2>
Marcy Cortes Wells Fargo Services Company -----Original Message----- From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 13:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LINUX-390] Relative DASD performance Has anyone done performance testing that they can share to get numbers on relative performance of the same DASD, accessed under z/Linux, depending on whether it's presented as direct-attached 3390 or FCP SCSI? Basically, my question is, all other things being equal, let's say I have a Shark and I want to get data off it into a Linux image: am I better off mounting that disk as SCSI or ECKD ? Adam
