Post, Mark K wrote:

I would also echo Adam's sentiment about keeping the number of
point-to-point links per guest small.  It becomes a management nightmare
more than anything.  From your question, I'm assuming you're not up to z/VM
4.3 then?



Heck, no, we just went to z/VM 4.4.


However, and promise not to giggle if you're going to read the rest of
this, our network security folks don't want GuestA talking to GuestB
directly if they can help it; they'd sleep better at night if they could
sniff each packet and be sure nothing hinky is going on. I'd love to use
a Hypersockets LAN, but that wouldn't allow that. (Never mind that two
AIX systems on the same subnet talk directly without being vetted by the
firewall; this is Linux, and the network security folks are convinced
that's less secure than our existing platforms.)

Sigh,
Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Laflamme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewalls?

Related question: are there practical limits to how many point-to-point
connections a Linux image can manage?

Thanks,
Nick

Reply via email to