I like my databases big so using PAV to hook up to those anorexic 3390s is still a poor cousin to FCP where I can carve out chunks of disk as big as I want.
-----Original Message----- So, uh, Neale: How long is it going to take you to do some performance stats to tell me whether I'm better off mounting a big database (which will be on a Shark) on DASD that's presented as FCP SCSI or as PAV-attached ECKD?
