No advantage whatsoever. Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940 VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word "absquatulation" has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the Kelpie next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. > ---------- > From: Marcy Cortes > Reply To: Linux on 390 Port > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How much $$ > > We're back to 1 processor now. > > I've always defined the Linux guests with 1 virtual CPU since I had 1 real > licensed. Now you've got me curious... There isn't any value to defining > more than 1 virtual CPU when you only have 1 IFL is there? > > Marcy Cortes > > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Post, > Mark K > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] How much $$ > > > I would think not. The MP effect usually guarantees that 1 2-processor > system is significantly less than 2 1-processor systems. The amount of lost > capacity has decreased over the years, but it is still non-zero. > > > Mark Post > > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > James Melin > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How much $$ > > > Even though you set the weights to '1' processor, do you get better > throughput having 2 processors actually doing the work? > >
