Like I said, the problems have all been on the hardware side. The guys who manage it haven't been able to get the port names, etc. properly defined so we can see them. Our attempts have been intermittent with long delays in between due to other priorities.
So by "hardware", I guess I actually mean "hardware administration". > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Ferguson, Neale > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] dasdfmt with a 1K block size - still not > recommde d? > > > What FCP problems have you been having? We've been working fine using: > 1. McData Switch > 2. ESS 2105-F20/ESS 2105-800 > 3. EMC-8730 > > -----Original Message----- > Unfortunately, we needed a quicker solution. We've been > working on and off > for about a year trying to get fcp working with no luck. > (The problems have > all been on the hardware side.) > > The info about block sizes, etc. couldn't have come at a > better time. We > just had a meeting to discuss how we're going to handle this, > and were able > to make some very intelligent recommendations. > The user is also going to change their process to use less space. > ============================================================================== If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. <http://www.ml.com/email_terms/> ==============================================================================
