What is wrong with:

rpm -qilp [package].rpm

It will tell you every file in the package and where it gets installed.

--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Assistant Vice President
Linux Design and Engineering
Bank of America
(972) 997-9641

The opinions expressed in this message are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect 
the opinions of my employer, Bank of America.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RPM question
>
>
> I found tripwire to be useful in identifying added files when
> creating or updating complex RPM's.  Run it before doing
> make/make install, and again after, and you get a list of
> files added and
> changed.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Alan Cox
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:53 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] RPM question
> >
> >
> > On Mer, 2004-02-18 at 18:15, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> > > On my slackware (Intel) I always used the 'configure, make,
> > make install'
> > > process. It worked flawlessly everytime. This way I always
> > got the latest
> > > software. With RPMs I have had problems and then I had to
> > go under the
> > > hood. RPM's are usually behind since there is a process to
> > build the RPM
> > > and test it.
> >
> > You can do that with RPM based distributions too, but it
> > turns them into
> > slackware rather rapidly (ie no dependancy management, no
> > verification,
> > no change control)
> >
> > The way I normally roll an updated RPM is
> >
> > Grab old SRPM
> > Install
> > Edit spec file and change versions
> > Add new version tar ball into sources
> > Try and build
> >
> > Any patches that fail check if they have been applied or if
> > they matter.
> > Adjust and/or remove
> >
> > Build
> > Install
> >
>
> ==============================================================
> ================
>
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify
> the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose,
> copy, retain or redistribute it.
>
> Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
>      <http://www.ml.com/email_terms/>
>
> ==============================================================
> ================
>

Reply via email to