False assertions and unsubstantiated allegations. 1) Why do you say "the courts are not that smart"? What is your basis for this? I agree that we have an overly litiganous society and perhaps the U.S. judicial system is partly to blame, but I would put more of the blame on a greedy society that sees litigation as a way to achieve unearned wealth. SCO included
2) Why do you think that will be the end of Linux? It's a big world out there. So IBM loses a contract suit. Big deal. The source is already out there. You can't "undisclose" it. Even if Linux development is halted in the U.S. (unlikely), there is still Europe, Asia, etc. 3) What does liberal have to do with contract law? And do you know that the judges in the SCO v IBM case are liberal? Also, afaik, no judge has been assigned to SCO v AutoZone or SCO v DaimerChrysler. 4) Who is paying for which judge's vacation? A vague accusatory comment without substance. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 3:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SCO's 2 new linux user lawsuits > > > Sorry guys--->> they ,SCO, is going to win only because the > courts are not > that smart and liberal to the fullest extent ...so good bye > Linux hello > Windows .. oh bye the way the judges are all going on vacation paid by > ????? guess >
