Ref: Your note of Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:20:35 +0200 (attached) Apparently it can - I had my doubts, but that's what they gave me:
q vswitch VSWITCH SYSTEM VSWITCH1 Type: VSWITCH Active: 0 MAXCONN: INFINITE PERSISTENT RESTRICTED NONROUTER MFS: 8192 ACCOUNTING: OFF State: Ready CONTROLLER: TCPIP IPTIMEOUT: 5 QUEUESTORAGE: 8 PORTNAME: OSA1 RDEV: 0103 VDEV: 0103 This is on z/VM 4.4 - one of z/VM's development systems in fact. Bruce Hayden IBM Global Services ----------------------------- Note follows ------------------------------ From: Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: VSWITCH question To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Bruce Hayden wrote: >Yes, generate more OSA I/O devices and then specify one of them (such as >103) for the vswitch. I have exactly this configuration working on a >couple of systems. This is not unlike sharing an OSA between LPARS, but >in this case the sharing is all within the same LPAR. > > Well not 103, I suppose because that is odd? Can CP sort that out for VSWITCH ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
