Gregg and Arnd, Thanks very much for your input, guys! As you may have deduced, I'm working on finding ways to safely and easily allow kernel and application sharing work on the 2.6 kernel. It -does- seem that the early mount of /dev/pts is causing my difficulties, and I'm having trouble figuring out how to get the system to remount. It's this kind of "basic research" which helps me learn and become "a danger the community". ;-)
You can be certain that an update to my presentation at http://linuxvm.org/present/misc/basevol.html will be forthcoming. -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregg C Levine Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 Kernel Hello (again) from Gregg C Levine I second that thought. And a little late perhaps. William see if you can boot with your earlier kernel, and make a note of the messaging output that the whole process generates. Then reset things to talk to the newer one, and match the notes you've made with the ones that the newer kernel is printing out. Granted there will be some differences, the 2.6 family has something different then with the 2.4, but that's to be expected. You need to look for the getpt reference. In my case I had forgotten to enable it in the configuration routines the last time I attempted to work with a 2,6 kernel. ------------------- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------ "The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."� Obi-Wan Kenobi > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Arnd Bergmann > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 7:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Linux 2.6 Kernel > > On Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2004 21:48, Scully, William P wrote: > > My goal is to force certain directories in the tree to be R/O instead of > > R/W. But I'm at a loss as to where "getpt" is looking such that it says > > "No such file...". I thought it was in /dev, but I'm *-certain-* /dev > > is R/W. > > Could it be that your /dev/pts is mounted on the original /dev, not the > rw bind mount? > > Arnd <>< > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX- > 390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
