Actually, in the mainframe side, the mean time between failure (per an IBM Road show yesterday), is about 60 years.
A processor fault, is handled by the hardware and you should never see it. So, VM doesn't handle it as it would never see it. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/10/04 12:57PM >>> > VMware can do things that VM can't... Imagine taking a > running active server and dynamically moving it to > another physical processor -- never missing a beat. > What type of scenerio would this be useful on zSeries hardware? I thought IBM indicates it to have a mean up time of 99.999%. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
