Isn't it more likely IBM could continue to relieve the few situations that
require POR than to develop the VM guest teleportation facility?
Adding or removing storage, processor, or memory resources should not
require a POR and should be supported by the hypervisor (LPAR and z/VM) and
the hardware. We are not where we need to be yet but the high availability
of the current offerings helps to offset the missing capabilities with a
little planning.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
"Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..."
-----Original Message-----
For example: Over the weekend you're going to update your machine and turn
on another IFL -- that requires the entire box VM, LPARs, servers to be
shutdown for a POR/IML...
<><><>
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic
copies of the original message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
