On May 4, 2005, at 12:43 PM, James Melin wrote:


Ultimately I am thinking weekly full volume backups via CDL (so I get such things as the cyl-0, the IPL records, etc) and daily incrementals via either bacula or the NFS option. What is the best way to copy only changed files?

Set up your backup definitions so you only ever do incrementals.

If you really really want minimal-size, and only want to take the
deltas to the files that have changed, rather than the changed files
themselves, you probably want to look at rolling your own rsync-based
solution, or poking through sourceforge and seeing what's out there.
I know people who do this successfully, although I prefer a more
traditional backup solution, like Bacula.

Right now I don't have VM ownership of those two tape devices, and
I'm not sure that I can sell that to anyone. Don't really have a
direct
means of having VM tell z/OS in another LPAR that it is time to
give it the
tape drives for a while.

The other question is this... if I go the NFS option, which is the
most
likely, will rsync work for me, or will it be a problem.


Should work fine.

Ultimately I'd want to do NFS backup target datasets as a GDG so I
could go
back to previous versions if I had to. We are not using NFS on z/OS as
there has been no call for it locally. Can you NFS export the +0
GDG? I
don't know if thats practical or not. Also, there is the issue that
if I
use NFS, and immediately migrate the dataset by management class,
when it
comes time for backup, does it cause the previously migrated
version of the
dataset to be recalled, then backup proceeds and then re-migration
happens?
(presuming non-GDG)

Maybe David can answer this; my knowledge of z/OS NFS is confined,
mostly, to what it looks like from the Linux side of things when you
mount it.

Adam

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to