1) Have others observed this, or did we do something weird? This seems normal to me. You should only add disks to the back of the list. 2) Is there an easy way to recover? Removing the new added dasd and add it with a higher VDEV number to the end of the list. 3) Is there another way to address the devices -- one of our guys suggested /dev/dasd/4001, /dev/dasd/4002, etc. instead of /dev/dasdt1, /dev/dasdu1, etc. (I plan to try this today, but thought I'd ask). We started our LVM disks with VDEV 300 and only add to this list. 4) If the previous suggestion works, is there a reasonable way to change an existing LVM from the 'old' addressing scheme to the 'new' one? You'll have to add the disks in the same order with new VDEV adresses.
Regards, Kurt. Securex ICT Belgium - Confidentiality Notice - This communication and the information it contains is intended (a) for the person(s) or organization(s) named above and for no other person or organization, and (b) may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful! If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Please consult our disclaimer on our site www.securex.be Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
