If you want to use the hardware HiperSockets to talk between LPARs, that
will almost certainly give you the best network performance between
those two nodes.  Understand, however, that you will be limited to only
so many connections.  Even if you use the hardware HiperSockets, you
will still probably want to use VSWITCH so that your Linux guests can
talk to the rest of the network.  If you get z/Journal, there is an
article in the latest issue on planning and implementing VSWITCH for
Linux guests.  It includes all the z/VM setup so that things are
"permanent."


Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Roger Shipman
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Hipersockets vs qdio


Any one want to advise on the following?

I have Z/VM running with three Linux guests (sles9) sharing an OSA card
in qdio mode. I also have hypersockets working within the zvm and one
linux and two Z/OS 1.6 lpars.

I need to add several more linux guest, but I do not want to keep
sharing the osa card. 
I have been reading about the network setup using virtual lans, virtual
switches, and just defining a hipersockets nic.

I believe using hipersockets will give me better performance. Any one
know differently? Would I be better off just defineing the nic with
hiper and forget about all the virtual lan stuff? I read that you can do
this, but it did not say how. If so How do I do this...be specific
...I'm new at all of this, Linux and VM.

I know I can do these commands when logon as maint on vm, but where do I
place them to be permanent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to