Oh, there are some other ways around it, including defining another major node for dasd, but I will defer to souls wiser than I for that. Never tried it.
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Kreuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: linux db/2 limitations > > I had an interesting meeting today concerning a possible > project moving some existing DB/2 data on servers and z/os to > linux DB/2 under good ole z/vm. Someone on the project was > told that linux on db/2 had a 450Gigabyte limitation with the > size of a database, or tables, or ... > > This makes little or no sense to me ( 450Gigabyte isn't all > that big really). Also there are 1,000 tables scattered > around 100+ databases. Hey - I am not the architect here. > > Is anyone out there running linux DB/2 with aggregate sized > DBs exceeding 450G? Anyone aware of limits running DB/2 on > linux under z/VM? > > Thanks, > David > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access > instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the > message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
