On Monday, 11/28/2005 at 06:41 EST, "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, then maybe I should point out that the two IP addresses are indeed > different, in the third octet: > 192.168.140.60 HIPERLF0 > 192.168.141.60 HIPERLF1 > > If the intent was to actually assign the same IP to both interfaces, > then they either typoed it, or typoed it in sending it to the mailing > list.
Well, duh. :-) My eye Dr. appointment is Thursday and none too soon! (Chuckie is off the hook on this one, I'm sorry to say.) STEVE: You need a route to 141.63 AND you have to have PRIROUTER on your ETH0/ETH2 interfaces for all this to work. 1) That second line should read: 192.168.141 = HIPERLF1 8192 0 instead of 192.168.141.60 = HIPERLF1 8192 HOST to fix the existing problem (no route) and (b) not have to add more entries later when you add more hosts to the Hipersocket. Rule #16: Never put your own IP address in a Gateway entry. 2) Double-check that the Linux default gateway is 141.60, not 140.60. 3) As an aside, that still leaves: > 10.140.1.24 = ETH2 1500 HOST which cannot be correct since 10.140.1.24 is the home address on ETH2 (Rule 16 again). I think it should be 10 = ETH2 1500 0.255.255.0 0.140.1.0 but beware since you now have two routes to the same subnet (ETH0 and ETH2) and that whole AssortedParms EqualCostMultiPath thing comes into play. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
