Mark,
I being trying to access Windows machines and getting "timeout" during
the mount or .smbmount.
The Windows(XP and 2000) machines running DHCP...
Mark Post
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
et> To
Sent by: Linux on
390 Port [email protected]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
ist.edu>
12/27/2005 01:31
PM
Subject
Re: NFS vs Samba
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ist.edu>
The general rule of thumb I use is that if Windows machines need to access
something, I use Samba, since most of them don't have an NFS client. If
not, I use NFS.
Mark Post
-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NFS vs Samba
Assumming that both NFS and Samba can do the same thing, which is
faster?
Which uses the less resources?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
-----------------------------------------
This message and its attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this
email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your
computer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
