Well I should expect, to prevent confusion if this is really and truly your gold master then the frelling name should reflect it. I don't, as a rule, install release candidates. Even if the release candiate has been 'declared gold'. You can declare lots of things. Doesn't make them true. Evidence, on the otherhand, carries much more weight with me.
Isn't bronze a bit too boastful? I was thinking Talc or shale master given all the scrozzeling. Just my opinion. Linux on 390 Port <[email protected]> wrote on 02/23/2006 03:21:09 PM: > On 2/23/06, Ihno Krumreich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes. But as you said. Its a "Release Candidate" and this release > candidate was > > declared gold master. > > Considering the track record with SP3, starting with "bronze master" > would have been appropriate ;-) > > Rob > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
