Hello! I agree. There are messages to paper a virtual room with, on a list discussing one of the BSD operating systems, and Xen. It seems to be decidedly unstable with regards to the networking issues. And regards to the boot processes for launching a domain.
However, many people are seeing success by using that release of Xen and either Red Hat, or Debian, but definitely not SuSe. I suspect Slackware would definitely work, but I do not have the machine resources to try it. -- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- "Remember the Force will be with you. Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi > -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Rod > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 5:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LINUX-390] OT: Re: Re-compile XEN 3.0 > > Xen 3.0 is not what I would call worth bothering with. There's > too many hiccoughs been reported. Frankly I don't know why > they released it. Anyway, 3.0.2 is due RSN by all accounts > so you may be better off looking at that. > > On top of which there have been all sorts of hiccoughs > reported with Xen and OpenSUSE 10 and the suggestions > are to go with garloff's rpms (whoever he/she/it is). > > If you really want to carry on with this stuff then I strongly > suggest that you look at the Xen mailing lists, searchable > versions of which are available via Gmane, to wit: > > gmane.comp.emulators.xen.user > gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel > > both on news.gmane.org > > -- > Rod > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX- > 390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
