Post, Mark K wrote: > I've been meaning to get back to this for some time. I looked at the > SLES9 kernel source. There's nothing in the smbfs code that would > generate that kind of message. I'm guessing that SUSE/Novell hacked the > modutils code to put out that message and set the kernel tainting on. > Which is a correct assumption.
Modules supported by Novell != GPL modules. Hence the different wording. > Just exactly _why_ they would do that, I have no idea. Has anyone seen > any statements from Novell that smbfs would not be supported in SLES9? > Errm. No, I certainly haven't. And I think our samba team would be quite disappointed if that would be the case. Anyone care to open a bugzilla? THX, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
